- A brief account of the history of logic, from the The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (edited by Ted Honderich), OUP 1997, 497-500.
- A biography of Peter Abelard, published in the Dictionary of Literary Biography Vol. 115, edited by Jeremiah Hackett, Detroit: Gale Publishing, 3-15.
- Philosophy in the Latin Christian West, 750-1050, in A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages, edited by Jorge Gracia and Tim Noone, Blackwell 2003, 32-35.
- Ockham wielding his razor!
- Review of The Beatles Anthology, Chronicle Books 2000 (367pp).
- A brief discussion note about Susan James, Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.
- Review of St. Thomas Aquinas by Ralph McInerny, University of Notre Dame Press 1982 (172pp). From International Philosophical Quarterly23 (1983), 227-229.
- Review of William Heytesbury on Maxima and Minima by John Longeway, D.Reidel 1984 (x+201pp). From The Philosophical Review 96 (1987), 146-149.
- Review of That Most Subtle Question by D. P. Henry, Manchester University Press 1984 (xviii+337pp). From The Philosophical Review 96 (1987), 149-152.
- Review of Introduction to the Problem of Individuation in the Early Middle Ages by Jorge Gracia, Catholic University of America Press 1984 (303pp). From The Philosophical Review 97 (1988), 564-567.
- Review of Introduction to Medieval Logic by Alexander Broadie, OUP 1987 (vi+150pp). From The Philosophical Review 99 (1990), 299-302.
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Embraces
THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CRISIS . G20
The location is unimportant.
The setting is always the same.
It includes an academic building,with the appropriate auditoria,
seminar rooms,and refectories ; book displays ; a message centre ;
the indispensable paraphernalia of recording and mimeographing,
keeping a secretarial staff properly occupied and very well paid.
THE PARTICIPANTS,in all the era,ARE MORE OR LESS THE SAME.
Upon arrival,and leaving,there is much SHOULDER-CLAPPING
and EMBRACES.
There is much discussion,ESPECIALLY AT THE BAR,
of matters unrelated to the present meeting.
Important people are there,doing un-important things.
The important people come from 20 different countries,
yet they seem very much alike.
They are conservatively dressed,in business suits,
less polite,less cautious,less interested in collecting
the appropriate documents,and prone to appearing
in more sophisticated and full of sorrow faces,
- sorrow for us,they had,in advance,decided our destiny -.
How do they speak apout the crisis in such a setting ?
Well,practice helps.In any case,important people are
been in the habit of speaking about poverty and crisis.
And it certainly helps that the people in crisis
are not in visible evidence.
The underlying population are topics of discussion,
NOT PARTICIPANTS IN IT.
One can probably tell a lot about these important people
by the way they treat those who clean their bathrooms
or serve them,and according of that,what kind of decisions
they take for our crisis.
The location is unimportant.
The setting is always the same.
It includes an academic building,with the appropriate auditoria,
seminar rooms,and refectories ; book displays ; a message centre ;
the indispensable paraphernalia of recording and mimeographing,
keeping a secretarial staff properly occupied and very well paid.
THE PARTICIPANTS,in all the era,ARE MORE OR LESS THE SAME.
Upon arrival,and leaving,there is much SHOULDER-CLAPPING
and EMBRACES.
There is much discussion,ESPECIALLY AT THE BAR,
of matters unrelated to the present meeting.
Important people are there,doing un-important things.
The important people come from 20 different countries,
yet they seem very much alike.
They are conservatively dressed,in business suits,
less polite,less cautious,less interested in collecting
the appropriate documents,and prone to appearing
in more sophisticated and full of sorrow faces,
- sorrow for us,they had,in advance,decided our destiny -.
How do they speak apout the crisis in such a setting ?
Well,practice helps.In any case,important people are
been in the habit of speaking about poverty and crisis.
And it certainly helps that the people in crisis
are not in visible evidence.
The underlying population are topics of discussion,
NOT PARTICIPANTS IN IT.
One can probably tell a lot about these important people
by the way they treat those who clean their bathrooms
or serve them,and according of that,what kind of decisions
they take for our crisis.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



No comments:
Post a Comment