- A brief account of the history of logic, from the The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (edited by Ted Honderich), OUP 1997, 497-500.
- A biography of Peter Abelard, published in the Dictionary of Literary Biography Vol. 115, edited by Jeremiah Hackett, Detroit: Gale Publishing, 3-15.
- Philosophy in the Latin Christian West, 750-1050, in A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages, edited by Jorge Gracia and Tim Noone, Blackwell 2003, 32-35.
- Ockham wielding his razor!
- Review of The Beatles Anthology, Chronicle Books 2000 (367pp).
- A brief discussion note about Susan James, Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.
- Review of St. Thomas Aquinas by Ralph McInerny, University of Notre Dame Press 1982 (172pp). From International Philosophical Quarterly23 (1983), 227-229.
- Review of William Heytesbury on Maxima and Minima by John Longeway, D.Reidel 1984 (x+201pp). From The Philosophical Review 96 (1987), 146-149.
- Review of That Most Subtle Question by D. P. Henry, Manchester University Press 1984 (xviii+337pp). From The Philosophical Review 96 (1987), 149-152.
- Review of Introduction to the Problem of Individuation in the Early Middle Ages by Jorge Gracia, Catholic University of America Press 1984 (303pp). From The Philosophical Review 97 (1988), 564-567.
- Review of Introduction to Medieval Logic by Alexander Broadie, OUP 1987 (vi+150pp). From The Philosophical Review 99 (1990), 299-302.
Showing posts with label being in itself. Show all posts
Showing posts with label being in itself. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
The Champion of Being
Being is never excausted by any of its phenomenal aspects ;
no particular perspective reveals the entire character of Being.
Being-in-itself is fixed,
complete,
wholly given,
absolutely contigent,
with no reason fot its being ;
it is roughly equivalent to the inert world of objects and things.
Being-for-itself is INCOMPLETE,
FLUID,
indeterminate ;
it corresponds to the being of human consciousness.
Being-in-itself is prior to Being-for-itself ;
the later is dependent upon the former for its origin ;
Being-for-itself is derived from being-in-itself by an act of NIHILATION,
for being-fot-itself is a nothingness in the HEART OF BEING.
no particular perspective reveals the entire character of Being.
Being-in-itself is fixed,
complete,
wholly given,
absolutely contigent,
with no reason fot its being ;
it is roughly equivalent to the inert world of objects and things.
Being-for-itself is INCOMPLETE,
FLUID,
indeterminate ;
it corresponds to the being of human consciousness.
Being-in-itself is prior to Being-for-itself ;
the later is dependent upon the former for its origin ;
Being-for-itself is derived from being-in-itself by an act of NIHILATION,
for being-fot-itself is a nothingness in the HEART OF BEING.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)